A group of Gaurs in Radhanagari had come out of the forest and were reported to damage crops in the nearby villages. The villagers are asking the forest officials to take back 'their' animals and compensate for the losses suffered by them. Farmers are now being reported to use their own methods to protect their farms from the intruders- a wire carrying electric current. Three gaurs so far have reportedly being killed, their bodies taken into the forests and the evidence destroyed.
As always, the animals are at loss in this fresh human-animal conflict. Humans ( or animals) are playing their roles very well in trying to protect their territory and in the case of gaurs, increasing theirs.
Gaurs have come out due to scarcity of food in the forest but they really are intruding into the land owned by humans (No matter how much these humans have encroached upon the gaurs' land so many years ago). However, officially (for humans) the government-protected animals have caused damage to the crops and the people are now asking to pay the government to pay for the mess their pets did.
Environmentalists are asking for identifying people who allegedly killed the gaurs and give punishment for their deeds.
Besides being an issue of conservation and property loss, all this thing is about a species trying to increase its territory and the other protecting its own. Though humans have made provision by law for the protection of some species, the species itself is trying to survive and multiply. The guars in this case, if given chance, obviously would try to occupy more and more amount of land. Humans, prior to reservation of land for forests, have done the same thing.
The farms near the forest area are bound to be encroached by the animals inside. I do not know if there is any provision in law to compensate for the damage done by wild animals (protected by law) to such farms but it seems quite logical. Prior to the laws, the villagers could exploit the forest as they wished. and now, they can't. They are only to watch their farms being eaten or destroyed while animals like gaur, wild boars, etc. rampage through. Most farmers in India have very little farms which when destroyed would leave them with no food and money all year. So, compensation to farmers is quite correct.
Killing of animals, however, is difficult to deal with. Humans always have occupied land by killing whatever was harmful to his purpose. Most of the developed countries have destroyed most of its wildlife while colonizing new areas. Protecting such magnificent animals like gaur, surely must have ecological significance but by and far it is more of aesthetic value to most animal and nature lovers including me. I really admire the beauty of gaurs and want to have them survive till eternity. But this must be within their reserved areas. Any damage to human property because of them should be liable for compensation and any encroachment by humans into the forest must be liable for punishment. Laws have made borders and laws should be responsible for any problems arising from their breach.
Note: I know I am not eligible enough to comment on such issues. These are just my opinions.
As always, the animals are at loss in this fresh human-animal conflict. Humans ( or animals) are playing their roles very well in trying to protect their territory and in the case of gaurs, increasing theirs.
Gaurs have come out due to scarcity of food in the forest but they really are intruding into the land owned by humans (No matter how much these humans have encroached upon the gaurs' land so many years ago). However, officially (for humans) the government-protected animals have caused damage to the crops and the people are now asking to pay the government to pay for the mess their pets did.
Environmentalists are asking for identifying people who allegedly killed the gaurs and give punishment for their deeds.
Besides being an issue of conservation and property loss, all this thing is about a species trying to increase its territory and the other protecting its own. Though humans have made provision by law for the protection of some species, the species itself is trying to survive and multiply. The guars in this case, if given chance, obviously would try to occupy more and more amount of land. Humans, prior to reservation of land for forests, have done the same thing.
The farms near the forest area are bound to be encroached by the animals inside. I do not know if there is any provision in law to compensate for the damage done by wild animals (protected by law) to such farms but it seems quite logical. Prior to the laws, the villagers could exploit the forest as they wished. and now, they can't. They are only to watch their farms being eaten or destroyed while animals like gaur, wild boars, etc. rampage through. Most farmers in India have very little farms which when destroyed would leave them with no food and money all year. So, compensation to farmers is quite correct.
Killing of animals, however, is difficult to deal with. Humans always have occupied land by killing whatever was harmful to his purpose. Most of the developed countries have destroyed most of its wildlife while colonizing new areas. Protecting such magnificent animals like gaur, surely must have ecological significance but by and far it is more of aesthetic value to most animal and nature lovers including me. I really admire the beauty of gaurs and want to have them survive till eternity. But this must be within their reserved areas. Any damage to human property because of them should be liable for compensation and any encroachment by humans into the forest must be liable for punishment. Laws have made borders and laws should be responsible for any problems arising from their breach.
Note: I know I am not eligible enough to comment on such issues. These are just my opinions.
No comments:
Post a Comment